Adventure Time: The Modern Magicom | Kevin Pabst

Screen Shot 2016-10-03 at 10.33.32 PM.pngStill from Adventure Time, “Slumber Party Panic” (Season 1, Episode 1, 2010).

I was very tempted to take Gary Kenton’s remarks on the cultural influence of the music of the 60s and run with it, hashing out a pretentious and self-righteous post about the golden age of music, now long-dead, and the abysmal state of the current music industry…but this is a sitcom class, so I will spare you all my snobbish inclinations, in regards to music, at least.

Instead, I’ll take his more relevant claims on magicoms and see what I can argue from there. Though music may have gotten steadily worse since the 60s (ok now I’m done), the same cannot be said of television, which has gradually improved, technically, thematically, representationally, take your pick. Kenton argues that the magicoms of the 60s take escapism to an entirely new level. Rather than depict an alternative reality, these shows abandon reality altogether. Yet, I would argue (at least based on my admittedly limited knowledge of these shows) that these magicoms are actually rooted in the reality of the time, at least attitudinally. Sure, there may be a witch or a genie or a talking horse to remove the series from the real world by a few degrees, but the ways in which these shows engage with social issues (or ignore them) is arguably reflective of the time: traditionalist values fighting off the encroaching threat of progressivism.

But instead of drawing a comparison to a modern show in regards to its retrogressive tendencies, I would like to speculate as to how the magicom has evolved to embrace everything it was lacking half a century ago. I can think of no other show that abandons the planes of reality as gleefully or beautifully as Adventure Time, the Cartoon Network series following the antics of Finn, the last living human, and Jake, his shape-shifting magic dog. It’s got witches. It’s got genies. It’s got talking horses. And so much more that has never been seen on other television shows before. But unlike the magicoms of the 60s, Adventure Time does make many comments on the human condition, it is strikingly relevant, and it is fantastically progressive. As Emily Nussbaum writes for The New Yorker, Adventure Time is one of the most philosophically risky and, often, emotionally affecting shows on TV. It’s beautiful and funny and stupid and smart, in about equal parts, as well as willing to explore uneasy existential questions.”

Perhaps it’s a bit of a stretch to label Adventure Time a “magicom,” as it is its own unique thing with very few parallels, but the show does fit a number of the technical definitions applied to the series of the 60s. What has been updated is the progressivism, relevancy, and commentary, which Adventure Time deals in spades. Bewitched and I Dream of Jeanie both presented female protagonists imbued with incredible powers, but both desired and actively practiced subservience to their husbands and were denied agency, dignity, and often half of their clothes. Mr. Ed and My Mother the Car both featured non-speaking or inanimate objects granted the ability of speech and consciousness, but neither seemed to have a purpose for existing. And none of the magicoms of the 60s offered any sort of commentary on the social, political, or cultural landscapes of the time.

Adventure Time could not be further from these pitfalls. It provides a plethora of empowered female characters exercising agency over their own lives. One such character is Princess Bubblegum, who not only rules an entire kingdom single-handedly and regularly makes life-changing discoveries or groundbreaking inventions, but who refuses the romantic advances of Finn and often inverts the “damsel in distress” trope to rescue the male heroes. The show’s relevancy and social commentary are also both abundant, from its engagement with depression in the form of the lonely, isolated, and misunderstood Ice King, to its empathetic portrayal of the awkward growing pains Finn encounters, to its depiction of a complicated and difficult relationship to family as experienced by an anthropomorphic talking lemon.

The show is relatable, inventive, and above all, humanist (despite only having one human character). While it seemingly ditches nearly all traces of reality, it holds tight to the relevancy and commentary the magicoms of the 60s seemed to drop. It’s a series Gary Kenton would love, and for that matter, that everyone would love because frankly it’s impossible to dislike this show (excuse my hyperbolism, but if you do dislike it, I’m convinced you must have no feelings). Sure, in a way, the show is a vehicle for escapism. It will often make you feel like a child again. But at the same time, it is also quite grounded. Adventure Time will appeal not only to your worry-free inner-child, but also to your anxiety-ridden, miserable grown-up adult self, and you will often find yourself struck by how touching and deep it gets.

Excuse me while I go re-binge this entire series.

–Kevin Pabst

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Adventure Time: The Modern Magicom | Kevin Pabst

  1. mediaphiles says:

    This is an awesome claim you’re making here! Adventure Time is a trippy, intelligent, and cute show. I love the Ice King, who I think presents a good proof for your argument: he has magical powers typical to the magicom but also reflects the problems of hubris that many professional people face which thwarts all their relationships, leaving them lonely. In this way, the Ice King can be seen as escapist, in that he is both magical and has departed from the circumstances of his previous life as an archaeologist, his character offering real-world context to the problems of obsession.
    – REECE GUIDA

  2. mediaphiles says:

    I’m surprised you didn’t mention the gender flip episodes in this post, as you’ve mentioned them to me on several occasions. Often unprompted. Adventure Time is amazing. Not only is Princess Bubblegum strong, multidimensional, and just kickass, but so are almost all of the female characters. And almost all of the male ones as well. You’ve told me that you think the Ice King is the best character on television, and I’m tempted to agree. He seems like a one note villain then, like an onion, many many many layers are revealed until he is the most heartbreaking character. What I’m saying doesn’t relate to your post that much, but we spent many evenings watching Adventure Time together or talking about it while stuffing our faces. Now we’re talking about it online. In front of potentially billions of people. Oh how technology has changed us. At least how we chat about Adventure Time. I’m sure we’re both still stuffing our faces. – Max Dosser

  3. marymdalton says:

    You and Gary would probably enjoy talking music. He did start his career in the music biz…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s