Birman by Alex Denton

Birdman soars.

Where does an actor turn when faced with his own mortality? Broadway, of course. Alejandro Iñárrito invites you into the tattered world of Riggan Thomson: the washed up, has-been star the Birdman franchise in the midst of a career revamp. Manipulated to look as though one take, Iñárrito develops a fresh lens through which to satirize Hollywood – one that not only pokes fun at celebrity culture, but anyone who would support a big-budget Hollywood film: us, the viewer.

Channeling his own post-blockbuster film star days, Michael Keaton envelopes this wash-up character, proving both his, and Riggan’s, place within our present day cinematic world (when looked at outside of the world of the picture, Keaton’s redemption holds true as he goes on to have a feature role in the Oscar winning movie Spotlight). Writers Iñárrito and Nicolás Giacobone establish the central conflict within the movie around the connotations of film versus theatre. Presented most clearly in the title, Iñárrito includes the classic blockbuster name Birdman as well as the pompous, self-righteous title of The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance. Self aware in their respective grandeur and pretention, these titles reflect Riggan’s transition from two opposing worlds. Though physically located in New York City, the concept of the Los Angeles and the LA movie star looms over the entirety of the plot. Trying to escape the tacky, Hollywood image, Riggan flees to New York in hopes of higher-brow artistic pursuits.

What differentiates film from theatre? Editing. Through employing this one take format, Iñárrito creates what feels more like a play caught on tape than a motion picture. Though strikingly similar to theatre is many ways, it is Emmanuel Lubezki’s stylish cinematography and shot composition (harkening back to his award winning performance in Gravity) that keeps the viewer within the world of cinema throughout the film.

The score, not to be forgotten, also works to contrast these two ideals. Antonio Sanchez composes a jazzy drum score for the majority of the film that serves as an elevated artistic presence. Yet, when in the mind of Riggan, the drums are drowned out by a full-body, classic Hollywood chorus. However different, both sounds could be produced by a theatre pit orchestra. Hmm…

11383_5

Birdman is a movie about movies, movie stars, and movie audiences. Iñárrito exposes not only the daily crucifixion of celebrities, but the agents responsible for it: us. Have we created a world in which the only place for blockbuster celebrities is on YouTube? In many instances it feels as though Iñárrito is holding up a mirror to his audience and exposing us for what we are and what we’ve done to those we admire from afar. Although this message could be easily conveyed through a dark, harsh picture, Iñárrito rather takes his audience on an adventure of twisted laughs, jazzy ensembles, and gravity defying stunts. Iñárrito discusses his experience with theatre in an interview with Indie Wire found here. Now, on my fifth screening of the film, I pick up on more and more of Iñárrito’s intentional message.

Alex Denton

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Birman by Alex Denton

  1. mediaphiles says:

    I thought the Birdman was a really meta movie like you said because it discusses two mediums, film and theater, by ironizing their conventions. But the supposed one-take continuous shot signals to the theater, because it’s assumed that that shot wasn’t edited it since it’s continuous. In this way Birdman synthesizes theatre and film, perhaps even reconciling them. – REECE GUIDA

  2. Love your opening lines. Catchy, cheeky, and right on target. The merging of film and theatre is certainly the most memorable part of the film, and in my opinion, the reason why it was so successful. What makes a film great (in my opinion)? Authenticity. The one take format that you point out combined with the superb acting make for a great film.

  3. mediaphiles says:

    I love your intro! It’s very catchy and makes it easier to keep reading. I also like that you incorporate a question to make the reader think in the last paragraph. It’s detailed, yet still very interesting!!
    -Maddie Dickens

  4. mediaphiles says:

    I really like the intro. Its different and really grabs the attention of the reader. Its very detailed when it comes to describing the important parts of the movie and feel like your vivid descriptions make it sound like a great movie to watch.

  5. mediaphiles says:

    I really like how this is written. For me the editing and the cinematography really make the film, because there has never been anything like the one shot editing done before.

    -Walker Rise

  6. Stephanie Albrecht says:

    Great response. Your intro was catchy and the style of writing was excellent throughout and kept the reader interested in not only the movie but what you had to say. I can’t wait to watch this film. – Steph Albrecht

  7. mediaphiles says:

    This was a great review. The style of your review, as well as the points that you make are very clearly stated and written in a very powerful way. The inclusion on how film differs from theatre is very wells stated and you do a great job of explaining the role of editing.
    – Cathy Maier

  8. mediaphiles says:

    As someone studying theatre and film, this movie appealed to me greatly. When I finally got around to watching it, I loved it. The seemingly one-shot filming style really works for this film. It thrusts the viewer into the world of the film and makes them feel as if they are taking part in the story as it unfolds. I think that the combination of this filming/editing style with the relatable subject matter is what made this film a masterpiece.- Valerie Medoff

  9. mediaphiles says:

    I like you explained the plot, editing choices, and compared theatre to film. This movie seems extremely appealing, as your review does a great job at explaining picture but also expressing your thoughts towards the film. Well done!
    -Peyton Perea

  10. mediaphiles says:

    Very well written, and I liked your points about Inarritu. He is a phenomenal film maker.

    Kellen

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s